The former Conservative leader William Hague has said it is time to ditch the triple lock on pensions – as figures showed the policy meant the state pension was likely to rise by 8.5% in April.
The cabinet minister Michelle Donelan later mounted a defence of the lock, which means increases in the state pension should be in line with whichever is highest of the average earnings increase, inflation or 2.5%. But the scale of the likely increase presents questions for both the Tories and Labour.
The policy was introduced under the coalition government but has long been an article of Conservative faith when it comes to shoring up an older support base. Hague described it as a “runaway train” that was creating a dangerous social and political situation by denying younger generations a fair stake in the economy.
The new figures also potentially present challenges for the Treasury as it considers how to find wriggle room for options such as pre-election tax cuts. There have been reports that figures in the government are mulling over making changes to the lock.
Hague cited a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies that found that maintaining the triple lock on state pensions could add as much as £45bn a year to the welfare bill by 2050, putting “insurmountable pressure” on the government to increase the minimum retirement age.
“A runaway train is a fair analogy because we don’t know where it will end up, or at what speed; it’s nearly going too fast already for the train drivers to slow it down, but if they don’t it will end in disaster,” he wrote in an article for the Times.
The “train drivers” – both main parties – understood this, he said, though neither could afford to commit electoral suicide by being alone in suggesting that change was needed. “Sometimes in politics you have to help each other a bit,” he suggested.
Asked about Hague’s views, Donelan said it was right to keep the lock because “vulnerable” elderly people were unable to increase their incomes in any other way.
“I think you justify it by saying: ‘Surely one of the primary functions of government is to look after the most vulnerable and in that group is the elderly,’” she told Sky News.
Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, repeatedly refused during an interview on BBC One to commit to keeping the triple lock on if her party won power. Speaking before a keynote speech to the TUC conference, she said that she did not want to make “unfunded spending commitments” without knowing the state the public finances would be in when the election came.
A Labour spokesperson later said that its position remained one of urging the government to stick to its commitment of maintaining the lock.
skip past newsletter promotion
Sign up to First Edition
Free daily newsletter
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
Enter your email address Enter your email address Sign upPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
Sunak refuses to make pensions triple lock election commitmentRead more
While pensioners could be set for a bumper state pension increase next April, many more could be dragged into paying tax, experts have said.
The comments followed earnings figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday, which indicated that the state pension could leap by 8.5% next April.
This could take the average weekly new state pension from £203.85 to £221.20, or from around £10,600.20 to £11,502.40 on an annual basis.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said the government was committed to the lock and, as usual, a statutory annual review of benefits and state pensions would take place in the autumn.
